Best MCP Memory Servers Compared: memory-mcp vs Alternatives
AI assistants forget everything when you close the chat. MCP memory servers solve this by giving your AI persistent memory. But with 190+ options on PulseMCP alone, which one should you choose?
The Problem: AI Amnesia
Every developer using Claude, GPT, or other AI assistants has experienced this: you spend hours explaining your project architecture, coding standards, and past decisions. Then you hit the context limit or start a new session, and the AI has no idea who you are.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) memory servers solve this by storing information that persists across sessions. But not all memory servers are created equal.
Quick Comparison Table
| Server | Storage | Search | Dependencies | Install |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| memory-mcp | SQLite | FTS5 | Minimal | npx |
| mcp-memory-service | Various | Embeddings | Heavy | npm |
| knowledge-graph | JSON | Graph | Minimal | npx |
| Recall (Redis) | Redis | Semantic | Redis | Docker |
| Graphiti (Zep) | Neo4j | Temporal | Neo4j | pip |
memory-mcp: Zero-Config Simplicity
memory-mcp takes a radically simple approach: SQLite + full-text search, no embeddings, no external services.
npx @whenmoon-afk/memory-mcpPros:
- Single SQLite file - portable, backupable, inspectable
- FTS5 full-text search - fast without embeddings
- Zero external dependencies - no Redis, no vector DB
- Auto-summarization and entity extraction
- Token budgeting for context-aware recall
- Works offline
Cons:
- No semantic search (keyword-based only)
- Single-machine storage (no cloud sync yet)
Best for: Developers who want something that "just works" without infrastructure.
mcp-memory-service: Feature-Rich
mcp-memory-service by doobidoo offers automatic context capture and broad client support.
Pros:
- Automatic context capture (less manual work)
- Supports 13+ AI tools (Claude, Cursor, Copilot, etc.)
- Semantic search with embeddings
Cons:
- Heavier dependencies
- More complex setup
- Requires embedding model
Best for: Teams using multiple AI tools who want automatic capture.
Knowledge Graph MCP: Relationship-First
Knowledge graph approaches store memories as entities and relationships, enabling queries like "what projects is Alice working on?"
Pros:
- Rich relationship modeling
- Good for complex domains
- Enables graph-based queries
Cons:
- More complex mental model
- Overkill for simple memory needs
Best for: Projects with complex entity relationships (CRM, project management).
Enterprise Options: Graphiti, Recall, mem0
For teams needing advanced features like temporal awareness, semantic search at scale, or cloud deployment, enterprise-grade options exist:
- Graphiti (Zep): Temporal knowledge graphs with Neo4j
- Recall: Redis-backed with semantic search
- mem0: Cloud-native memory layer
These require more infrastructure but offer advanced querying and scalability.
Our Recommendation
For most developers, memory-mcp is the best starting point:
- Zero-config installation
- No external services to manage
- Portable SQLite file you control
- Fast enough for most use cases
If you need semantic search or multi-client support, consider mcp-memory-service. For complex enterprise needs, evaluate Graphiti or mem0.
Getting Started with memory-mcp
Install in seconds:
npx @whenmoon-afk/memory-mcpOr add to your Claude Desktop config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"memory": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@whenmoon-afk/memory-mcp"]
}
}
}Restart Claude Desktop, and you'll have three new tools: memory_store, memory_recall, and memory_forget.
Want Cloud Sync?
Substratia Pro (coming soon) adds cloud sync, memory dashboard, and team features for memory-mcp users.
Join the Waitlist